SH. HUKMAT KHAN- versus HASHIM KHAN
Suit for pre-arrest Section 4 Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), Section 35 Punjab Preamble Ordinance (XVIII of 1990), Section 36 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) 14 10 1979 Was postponed to 22 3. The plaintiff's own plea was revived in 1982, but on 18 12 1988, ie the decision of the trial court on the basis of the principle laid down in the case of Syed Kamal Shah was revived after the dismissal on 17 7 1990. J990, which was dismissed on 19 2 1991, was dismissed by the District Judge, where a second after the plaintiff, was dismissed on 19 2 1991, till the request of the High Court to restore the case under section 36 of the Punjab Pre-Ordinance Ordinance. Reform was not obtained in which no decree was passed. In the case filed under the Punjab Permission Act, 1913, no decree could be passed on or before 31st, 1986, no pre-authorization claim was made under the provisions of Islamic law, Punjab. Section 36 of the Pre-Emergency Ordinance, S. 35 of the 1990 Pre-1990 Act and 1990 will not be attracted, after the amendment order has been reached, the Supreme Court dismisses the request and Refused to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Skardu lawyer