Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SOBHO versus THE STATE


Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 103 was filed after two hours of delay FIR witnesses were linked with interest and interest which required autonomy in the version. Lack of evidence led to conflicting weapons. The suspects were not sent to the Ballistic Express for comment, both advisers are police officers, recovery was a violation of Section 103, PC Ocular testimony came from interest and close-related testimony, sentencing by the trial court To justify, the defendant alone was in breach of the well-established principles of law and on the same evidence, the arrest of some of the accused and the punishment of others, by the trial court, in the absence of evidence of direct confirmation of the suspect. The benefit was given and they were acquitted. Conditions

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Bisham lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.