Find a Lawyer

SOBHO versus THE STATE

Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 103 was filed after two hours of delay FIR witnesses were linked with interest and interest which required autonomy in the version. Lack of evidence led to conflicting weapons. The suspects were not sent to the Ballistic Express for comment, both advisers are police officers, recovery was a violation of Section 103, PC Ocular testimony came from interest and close-related testimony, sentencing by the trial court To justify, the defendant alone was in breach of the well-established principles of law and on the same evidence, the arrest of some of the accused and the punishment of others, by the trial court, in the absence of evidence of direct confirmation of the suspect. The benefit was given and they were acquitted. Conditions best advocate from Sanjwal lawyer