Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE


Section 2302/4 334/7 337F (v) l394 / 396/458/460 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodwood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 Definition of Evidence was not entered in the court, the victim's house and the complaint The defendant did not identify them and in the statement parade, the eyewitness Said, in his statement, was trapped by the prosecution witness under Section 161, CRPC, saying that he saw the accused in front of the house. The deceased / complainant but did not give any details / specifications of the accused: The trial court relied on one of the accused in the previous case for his involvement in the case without facing the culprit. Be declared. The prosecution's testimony was not substantiated by any other independent source. O accused and thus they were acquitted of the charges against them

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.