Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE


Section 2302/4 334/7 337F (v) l394 / 396/458/460 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodwood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 Definition of Evidence was not entered in the court, the victim's house and the complaint The defendant did not identify them and in the statement parade, the eyewitness Said, in his statement, was trapped by the prosecution witness under Section 161, CRPC, saying that he saw the accused in front of the house. The deceased / complainant but did not give any details / specifications of the accused: The trial court relied on one of the accused in the previous case for his involvement in the case without facing the culprit. Be declared. The prosecution's testimony was not substantiated by any other independent source. O accused and thus they were acquitted of the charges against them

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Kunjah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.