The Section 115 Review Appellate Court ruled on the basis of trial, written statements and the evidence on record and the misconception of the facts. The case was not really one of the evidence and the sheer facts and observations given by the appellate court were rendered unrealistic. The evidence and reasons given in support of these conclusions were neither comprehensible nor reasonable, therefore, this verdict can be rightly called because the cross-appeals court has not only unlawfully but also its Had acted in his jurisdiction with the decision of material irregularity. The appellate court, in the circumstances, set aside the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
