MIRZA SARFARAZ ALI BAIG versus THE STATE
Sections 337L (2) and 337L (1) of the evidence were upheld for an 82-day ban on appeal for which no plausible explanation was presented for the injuries received by the witnesses. Was declared and he was in the hospital for 19 years, the day the accused is being treated, under Section 7 L L (1), PPC and not under Section 77 fall L (2), P The two injured witnesses of the PC were fully involved and their testimony was supported by medical evidence. The complainant and the accused were closely related to each other. To punish In the case of PPC, the PPC was changed to section 7 337L (1), PPC, and by the trial court, the penalty was to increase the penalty of Rs. 15,000 each. The appeal filed by the accused charged with a fine of Rs 5,000 on each RI of the year was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Samma Satta lawyer
