HABIB BANK WORKERS\' FRONT OF PAKISTAN versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS
Sections 2 (XXI), 62 and 87 Employer Bank's Collective Bargaining Unit and the Trade Union Collective Bargaining Agent have applied to all applicants of the Trade Union Bank (employer) as part of a collective bargaining unit. Requested to be announced nationwide. Supporting his claim by the petitioner, it was pointed out that the union was registered with the National Industrial Relations Commission because the whole establishment of the Trade Union Bank was controlled and managed by one party in terms of industry. The balance sheet, the profit and loss of the entire establishment of the bank was the same as running its business all over Pakistan. After the head office of Karachi Bank, it had more than 1,400 branches in all four provinces as well as Islamabad Capital Territory Bank. ? In the circumstances, the terms of section 2 (xxxii) of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 were against the spirit of the Trans Provincial Establishment, the registration of bank unions at the provincial level, the illegal and industrial relations act, 2012. What is more impressive in terms of Section 87 Act is that a collective bargaining unit was operating at the time of bank formation even after the Industrial Relations Act 2012, 2012, 2012, \ Trans Provincial \ There was no law or concept of the establishment; it was imperative that the unions at the provincial level were barred to avoid any inconsistency in the terms and conditions of mushroom growth. The exchange of workers' services under the law and permanent decisions of the High Courts, based on the certification of the National Industrial Commission, all on the basis of the National Industrial Commission's certification can be used for multiple purposes.
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2015
