Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ AHMAD LALI versus SALAHUDDIN SIDDIQUI, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Arts 8D (2) (i) and 3 Representation People Act (LXXXV of 1976), Sections 14 (5) and 99 (1A) (i) Representation of the People (Conducting Elections) Rules, 1977, R5 The rejection of the nomination papers by the Ethical Returning Officer Appellant, a former sub-inspector was dismissed from the job after he was prosecuted under the Punjab Police (Discipline and Discipline) Rules, 1975, which he deemed. That habit was absent. The essential factor was to prove that the dismissal of the appellant was on the basis of misconduct on moral grounds that the exact charge against the appellant was that he was absent from the duty and was morally abusive. There was no charge. Any brutality against it was revealed that he had resigned at one stage but was not accepted. Appellant's conduct clearly indicated that he was not in it. The police raided the service and wanted to quit his job, but his request was rejected and he was forced to leave his job. The circumstances of the case showed that the components of Article 8D (2) of the General Election Order, CLL (i) of 2002, did not attract the order that the order passed by the Returning Officer was illegal and set aside. had gone top civil advocates from Kurram lawyer