Find a Lawyer

GHULAM FARID versus THE STATE

Section (c) the testimony of the accused against the accused was that they recovered huge quantities of marijuana and opium, the recovery witnesses, who had no enmity with the accused, fully support the prosecution's case and There were no contradictions or contradictions in the statements. Prosecution witnesses said the witnesses were convincing and confident, and there was nothing on the record to deny them. And the witnesses had the same case that they had been falsely accused of. To provoke, but he did not present any evidence in support of his version, the defense version was not understandable. The prosecution overruled any suspicion against the accused. The allegations, in the circumstances, The sentence was justified and the trial was brought to a conclusion. The court concluded and the reasons presented by the trial court had properly examined the principles of justice in the criminal administration. Evidence of this cannot be set aside by the trial court's decision of any unlawful interference or instability. divorce advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer