FAIZ AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE
A VII, R 2, O VIII, Rr 1, 10 and O IX, Rr 6, 7, 13 suit for the recovery of the preceding order, the trial court granted the previous order passed in the trial, setting aside the defense striking. Put aside. At the request of the defendant and the defendant's failure to enter the written statement despite receiving several delays, it was postponed by the defendant to file the written statement, despite the defendant's somewhat lazy attitude in filing the written statement. The defendant was instructed to file his written statement at the next hearing, requesting the expense if the expenses were paid as expenses. The hearing will be excluded
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
