Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus GHULAM RASOOL

Sections 4 and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) pre-emptive right, application of the principle of non-distributable sale, sale of suit land on co-owner of single registered sale deed and two separate transferability property. Was already emptied. At the same time, the co-founder of Khata Sale Dead showed that the area sold was identifiable by specific measles numbers and that Wendy's made multiple payments to the seller to consider the sale, but The appellate court allowed the appeal and dismissed the suit High Court in exercising the jurisdiction of the appeal under Section 100 CPC and allowed the second appeal and ordered the case to be filed by the seller. Was raised because there were two separate changes in their favor, so the sale was not the first. Vendors were jointly compensated by the vendors for the entirety of the vacancy, the sale was unlawful, in favor of the sellers, the entire sale was already vacant The sale agreement was entered into earlier. And later, confirming the changes would not be of any benefit to the vendors, nor did any misreading or reading of evidence, or judicial error in the High Court decision. It was based on a Supreme Court law and was not open for exception. The appeal was denied. lawer from fb area from Bahawalpur lawyer