Find a Lawyer

MST. NOOR BIBI versus CHAIRMAN, EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE

Sections 17, 21, 27 and 28 of the Evaci Trust Property Rules (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1980, Article 7 and 8 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition, Appeal, Revision, Delegation of Representatives and Cases Releasing Powers Done. The default nature, purpose and scope, fact and legality, in the present case, did not attract the power of review, but rather the power to recall an order passed without heating. Prayer was not only in accordance with natural principles. In addition to the justice but also the relevant law and the provisions of the applicant's law under it, the authorities requested to withdraw the order passed and to re-hear the matter on eligibility, postponed for some days due to the lawyer's hearing. Had requested. It would not have made much difference if it had been approved, but rather the rejection of such petitions would have complicated the matter and eventually the decision of the case would have to be delayed and delayed. Authorities rejected the applicant's request, expressing a clear legal sense of misconduct and held that the law was unnecessary and unlawful, and that the administration of justice and justice is the only thing that has been built on the merits of the present case. Such a basic principle was ignored. Because the authorities were not sustainable in the law, it had no effect that the requests be considered pending with the federal government for reconsideration of the orders of the petition and a decision on the merits of the matter. Yes, it will be heard and decided. In accordance with the law in light of the High Court observations registration advocate from Ghizer lawyer