Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM JAFFAR KHAN versus MUHAMMAD NASRULLAH KHAN


The Constitution of Pakistan, suit for seizure of immovable property under section 199 constitutional petition, was present in the record of the present findings in connection with the seizure of the existing High Court, while exercising the constitutional jurisdiction under the following courts. The facts listed cannot be examined. There was no reason to agree to the eviction proceedings modified by the courts after the implementation of the decree, 15 of the 16 defendants withdrew their review and compromised the matter, which appeared in the constitutional petition filed. Was not done After a period of more than 4 1/2 months, the applicant was asked to suppress the material facts responsible for the heavy cost burden.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Multan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.