Find a Lawyer

MEERA versus THE STATE

Claims 2302 (b) / 434/3 353 / ?88 / ?9 ???? Complaints of appreciation of evidence, the police inspector prepared the complaint immediately after the incident and supported it in the trial, to the complainant. He was subjected to cross-examination for a long time, but nothing could be achieved by his defense. In addition, a minor contradiction of its importance, which could not be termed as a mistake during the long run, was also supported by the other eyewitness who was a member of the raiding party. As both complainants established their presence, there was no contradiction or contradiction at the site of the commission of the crime by the accused, which was present either with each other or with other witnesses in the statements of the respective witnesses. The witnesses said there was no motive and no question for the witnesses being falsely involved in the case. The alternate was born in this case. They both witnessed the incident and continued to show every detail of the case. Both the witnesses were shot in front of the accused's chest which resulted in his death. The medical evidence, which was supported by the report, was reported in the forensic science laboratory report that the seized property was fired from an ocular export rifle. The extent of the suspect's involvement in the commission of the crime was, in the circumstances, also confirmed to be vacant, the prosecution was able to bring home the crime for the accused beyond any doubt, the accused had the benefit of acquitting the co-accused. Could not be given. Since they have a functional character or injury, Pakistan, top advocate family court from Khyber Agency lawyer