Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Section 12 suits for the specific performance of the contract were agreed to execute the sale agreement between the parties and to receive a substantial sum from the claimant, but alleged that the period for the performance of the contract was 15 The day was settled and he changed the plaintiff and said that the fraud increased from 15 days to 2 months, failed to pay the balance and transfer the property in his name, between the parties. A valid agreement was found that was not intended at that time or was set in essence as a result of a sale agreement between the parties. At the time it was not held that the claim would not be filed by the plaintiff in the event of the expiry of the term, if it was assumed for the sake of argument, fraud was committed during the period of performance of the contract. Nothing impacts the timing of the sale agreement, it does not matter if the parties' trial trial court correctly dismissed the case, and the appellate court granted its amended jurisdiction. Setting aside the judgment and order passed by the trial court high court using, approved by the appellate court It did not justify restoring the judgment and order made and the trial. The court property advocates from Cherat lawyer