YASMEEN BIBI versus THE STATE
Section 354 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 18 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 347 Sending the accused jurisdiction to the Magistrate, Section 354, on an FIR under PPC, He was arrested and presented before a magistrate to be sent to a Judicial Lockup Magistrate who did not have the power to prosecute. Under the Ordinance, there was an action against the accused magistrate in 1979, which only requested the accused to send a judicial lockup, S. Could not be observed because, no challan was presented in front of them and they were trying the case. The appellate court, in the circumstances, rightly accepted the review against the order / observation of the magistrate order in the review by the appellate court in the absence of any unlawful action or irregularity.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Tarbela lawyer
