SHAIBAR versus BABU
Termination of Articles 6, 13 and 32 on the date, time and place where the plea was made, not only in the case, but also in the statement before the court suit, to the learned counsel on this score alone. Was also not made by the plaintiff in accordance with the law because the notice of notice was confirmed by two witnesses, but the plaintiff only examined, one witness and the other witness was not examined. In connection with the non-examination it was also known that the defendant had also been barred in the case filed by the plaintiff. Four-and-a-half months after the filing of the sale deed, it was filed that the plaintiff's confession was to count the period from the date of confirmation of the change as the sub-registrar had given notice pursuant to section 32 of the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act 1987 Failed to deliver. , Was canceled because the sale transaction was done through a registered sale deed and thus, when the case was registered for sale, the time for filing the case will begin when the trial court rigged. htly the case was dismissed and the appellate court did not justify setting aside the same decision and the trial court order was restored and the appellate court dismissed in review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kacha Khooh lawyer