NASEER AHMED versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 11 Bail, Further Investigation The FIR grant came to the Judicial Magistrate just two days after the alleged incident and the affidavit. Was sworn in He stated that he had not been abducted and that the alleged kidnapper accused had not made any complaint against the marriage and that he had marked the thumb in the presence of the bridegroom and that the abducted witness had been reported for about two days. The first was in police custody. Recording her statement, which expressed serious doubts about the authenticity and voluntary behavior of her statement, showed that the alleged kidnapper was expressing the party's consent and had not yet established a commission for adultery. It was when the evidence would be recorded that the accused came under the scope of section 497. 2), CR PC, he was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Raiwind lawyer
