Find a Lawyer

ZIA GHAFOOR PIRACHA versus CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, RAWALPINDI

Sections 12 (1) (a), 12 (8) (iii) (iv), 14, 15, 17 and 20 (1) (iii) of the Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1975. ), Article ? (185 ()) Regarding the Service of the Board Employees, the dismissal of the employees of the Board by the Chairman by nature, different types of persons were working in the board's classification. Some were called officers whose terms and conditions were enforced by the governing authority, but in respect of some employees in BPS 5 to 15, according to the Service Regulations of Board No. 8, the chairman had all the powers under the law and There are also Regulation Petitioners. The Chairman of the Board was appointed as the competent authority, it was said that disciplinary action could be taken against the employees by the defaulting administration, under the Service Regulations of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act, 1976. Shall be appointed under section 12 (1) (a). The Board does not have the legal status to adopt the Punjab Civil Service (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975 by the Board; the nature of the service regulations referred to in the High Court does not legalize, in this case, the constitutional request of the employees. Was rightfully rejected. Holiday applications for appeal were dismissed inheritance advocates near Chak 46 lawyer