Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus MST. NASIM AKHTAR

The plaintiff's case for plaintiff's declaration was that the home in the dispute was owned by her father and that she had joint property with the other defendants and that the plaintiff living in the plaintiff's house quoted a gift quota in favor of his wife. The house under which the registration was made. The gift process and as a result, he sold the suit house to a defendant through a registered sale deed, both of which stated that the plaintiff had declared the case illegal and void and he had sought order for the declaration that The gift work and sales process was ineffective. The rights and other defendants and the consequent relief plaintiff claimed an injunction for a separate portion of the 2/11 share in the suit house as a divided house, which the plaintiff resident in the house opposed. Which consisted of two parts. By giving her funds in the name of her mother, who had gifted her in exchange for the suit, the suit was dismissed by the accused below the court, who hanged Gee even though the work in favor of his wife had sued her. The house's special owner has been reported, but no reference has been made yet to show how the award was obtained in connection with the suit house. In his first suit, the defendant had bought or transferred any part of the suit house, he had clearly admitted that the suithouse was owned by his father and that his sisters and brothers had joint property. Submitted a certified copy of the first suit filed by him in which he confessed that the suithouse was owned by his father online advocate from Laliah lawyer