Find a Lawyer

MST. NASREEN AKHTAR versus HUSNAIN MEHDI

Sections 200, 202, 265c, 265d and 436 Offenses of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 (3) and 11 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 166/167, 165/163, 342/348 and 109 Crimes Against (Enforcement of Limitation) Ordinance (VIII of 1979), the trial court's testimony on the evidence of the 7th, relied primarily on the statements of the court witnesses in determining the fate of the complaint and evaluating it. Had failed to do or estimate it. The statements of the witnesses that the complainant submitted and excluded him merely by saying that the court could not prioritize the statements of the witnesses over the statements of the witnesses. The court's decision cannot be sustained. However, once, with regard to the provision of Section 6436, CRPC, the Federal Shariat Court, the cases are remanded to the trial court with instructions that, first, the statements of the remaining witnesses, named in the schedule. The matters connected with the W complaint, they will be registered and the complaint will be processed thereafter, in accordance with the law, the cases of Qazf will remain, however, until the fate of the complaint is decided. ask a advocate free from Dera Bugti lawyer