Find a Lawyer

KARIM P.V.C. PIPE FACTORY, FAISALABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE\'DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 13 (2) (a) Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman (2000 V of 2000), Section 9 Section RO 392 (I) / 01, Date 18 6 2001 Sales Tax General Order No. 2, 2001 Date 30 6 Simplified 2001 Tax Sales Tax Rolls, 1999 Exemption Fixed sales tax under RO 392 (I) / O1, which facilitates sales tax, despite submitting application to avail of the date notification rates. , The period from 1999 to 30 6000 includes the date of 18 6 2001. The best method of accuracy under the aforesaid notification is to decide on the merit of the petitioner / reviewer's assistance under Section 392 (I) / 01 of Article 186 2001, and if the said notification If relief is found under this reason, it should be given for the period covered under section RO 392 (I) / 01, dated 18 6 2001, for the benefit of section R 392 (I) / the complainant / SC No action was taken to suspend the request for. 01, dated 18 6 2001, the department proceeded to issue a notice of demand for tax payment, ich the complainant / principal claim under section RO 392 (I) / 01, payable on dated 18 6 2001 Which was more than the complainant's request to pay tax under section RO 392 (I). On 01/18/2001, the Department considered and decided in accordance with the spirit of Sales Tax General Order No. 2 issued by the Central Board of Revenue, 2001, which the Department had failed to do poorly. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Revenue Division, Collector Sales Tax, instruct Faisalabad to submit a complaint to the Complainant / Assessment, in light of the provisions of notification section R393 (I) / 01. 12th 2001 us immigration advocates from Jatoi lawyer