HABIB MASIH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Section 13 Shadows Rental Restriction Act (XI of the I63 of 1963), Section Pakistan17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for exclusion proceedings is located in the cantonment area. Was located within the boundaries of the city, but under which the evacuation proceedings began. The request for dismissal of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, was rejected by the Controller of Rent while the appellate court upheld the appeal and dismissal against jurisdiction against the tenant when the constitutional petition was before the High Court. The bar tenant took legal action. Is within the limits of the cantonment that the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 applied, and the cantonment board that exercised control of the rent could exercise jurisdiction only under the law, no question was relied upon by the jurisdiction of the place And for that it can be structured and allowed to be entertained. For the first time, the High Court in the West Pakistan had several jurisdictions exercised by the rent controller and the appellate court under the Ordinance, 1959, on the rent of the Western Pakistan civilian rent; there was no legal effect on the request for eviction by the rent controller or appellate court. The decision did not stand on a better basis than the forum without any jurisdiction which had no legal effect, in which case the jurisdiction was granted illegally and a removal request was filed by senior civil. The landlord was unable to appear before a judge / rent controller, as required by law Abq returned to appear before the appropriate forum for his decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
