Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus THE STATE

Section 514 of the Prohibition Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/148/149 were charged with forfeiture of a bond for which the applicants were on bail, appearing at trial, but they were present. Escaped when the court was about to make a final declaration. The judgment in the case was proceeded against the applicants / guarantees under Section 1414, CRPC and they were fined by the forfeiture of the whole surety bonds, the applicants filed the bonds in the court of Additional Sessions Judge. It was filed that the accused persons will appear in the said court. Subsequently, the trial against the accused was heard in the special court, nor were the accused ever asked to enter fresh bonds, nor did the applicants file any bond / agreement under which the accused was required to seize the bail and The imposition of fines on special requests will continue to appear in the transfer / special court order. The guarantees were set aside and the applicants were relieved of their liability under guaranteed bonds. patent advocate from Farooqabad lawyer