Find a Lawyer

DECIDED ON 16TH MAY, 2002. versus DECIDED ON 16TH MAY, 2002.

Sections 15 16, 17 and 181 Section RO, 1374 (I) / 98, dated 17 12 1998, CL (d) [as amended by section RO 496 (I) / 99 dated 22 4 1999] table. Serial number 1 read with I and serial number 4 section III section RO739 (I) / 99, dated 12 6 1999 section RO 843 (I) / 99, section 13 7 1999 section RO 1014 (I). / 99, Date 49 1999 Section R 1355 (I) / 99 Dated 16 12 1999 Section R 1367 (I) / 99 Dated 22 12 1999 Section R 21 (I) / 2000, Date 24 1 2000SicationR O 58 ( I) / 2000, Date 15 2 2000 Option: Paying fine for confiscating smuggled vehicles. The Department stated that in the case of Section RO 1374 (I) / 98, 17 12 1998, the release of smuggled vehicles was allowed on payment of Nail Fine, if duty / taxes are paid up to 15 3000, After the date in which the main entry in Serial No. 4 of Table III was made, the section RO was rendered useless and such vehicles could not be issued for payment of penalty for the seizure that would change only after 3,000 years. Such vehicles could not be. In return for confiscation without payment of fines, it is not correct to claim that there is a detailed description of the goods in Column 2 of Table III, despite the presence of a detailed description of the Vehicles Section RO 1374 (I) / 98. Will return to the smuggled goods category at serial number 1 of. The specific mention of vehicles in serial numbers 4 and 5 of Serial No. 4 and Serial No. 5 Section RO 1374 (I) / 98, III, had proved that the vehicles came only in Table II and not Section RO, 1374. In particular, the equipment referred to in Table I serial number 4 under section RO 739 (I) / 99, under section RO 739 (I) / 99, in section I, section 98, and particularly O was excluded from Serial No.1 of Table I of 1374 (I) / 98. If the CBR intention is like that tax advocates from Haroonabad lawyer