Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN SAQIB versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION; ISLAMABAD

Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) Written by the Civil Service of Quito Warranto, in order to carry out the directive given in the judgment of the Supreme Court in the decision of the Supreme Court, the B Tech (Hons) degree of B.C. A committee was formed to look at equality. After a detailed discussion on the issue of equality, the Degree decided in the light of the Supreme Court Committee's decision that candidates with BTech (Hons) qualifications should be considered for development. According to the recommendations of the Committee, two persons were appointed as Assistant. Developed as a Divisional Engineers Order. For the formation of the Committee and stated that the order of development was not challenged by any of the applicants, three years after the formation and promotion of the Committee, the applicant filed an application on which the applicant applied for a quality warrant. I prayed for guidance. It promotes what authority of the law they hold in advanced positions and that they should stop practicing it because the reason why such petitioner failed to demonstrate was because Why did it not challenge the formation and promotion of the committee immediately after the approval of the order under which the writ petition filed by the applicant came under the baton, if any complaint, against and against the above development? In the event of dismissal, he may file a representation, he may refer to the Service Tribunal Rights of Quiro Warnto, otherwise the petition Who was due to be released if a party had been filed by the interested person who was affected, the same unshakable order of the bail reporting online advocate from Malakwal lawyer