MUHAMMAD KAMRAN versus THE STATE
Sections 302 (b) and 377 offenses (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979) indicating the accused, would have been mentioned in the FIR, which was filed after the body's recovery. In the witness's house where the extra-judicial confession was found to be a crime, the arrest of the accused also strongly reflected on the voluntary status of the extra-judicial confession. The witnesses' close relationship with the defendants could not justify their statements as they were related to the complainant as well as the accused did not do so. Extra judicial confession before the above witnesses In any case the extra-judicial confession is attributable to the crime on which the conviction was based, which was neither voluntary nor true, and the confession was not strengthened by any evidence. He was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Talagang lawyer
