The trial court dismissed the request of the plaintiff or the appropriate party to show his name as defendant in a breach of contract suit for damages and compensation of Section 73 Civil Code (v. 1908), OI, R 10. Was. On the basis of an oral agreement between him and the other defendant, no specific role was mentioned against the plaintiff in the case and the plaintiff's primary complaint was against the plaintiff's company and its officers, while the defendant was only a State Advisor. The company's defendant was not the beneficiary of an oral contract. The contract breach can be claimed by a party who violated the terms of the contract. The person who was not a party to the contract was neither required nor required. The court, while setting aside the judgment of the trial court in the case of damages to a suitable party This allowed the application to display its name as the defendant's name, accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
