Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD INAYAT versus MANZOOR AHMED DHUDRA, ADVOCATE, GUJRAT

Section & 42 & Professional 42 Complainant of Professional Misconduct alleges that the Advocate had claimed himself to be a relative of the Judge before which the criminal case against the Complainant Party was pending and he was charged. The accused received the money from the fraudster. With the affidavit, the complainant, through his lawyer, demanded the refund of the said Advocate and requested disciplinary action against him when the Bar Council came to trial before the Dispensary Committee. Termed as false and serious. An Advocate Advocate himself submitted that in this case the complainant and his witness took special note that the complainant had allegedly paid the Advocate to return the offer accepted by the Advocate to the Complainant. Will be ready to do and will take special positions accordingly. , But when the Special Oath was processed, the Advocate R., referring to his offer and refusing to return the complainant's money, the Dispensary Committee referred the complaint to the Bar Council Complainant's Tribunal and ordered two witnesses Submitted that the complainant had illegally accepted payment of this amount to the Advocate. Transfer to the judge who was caught in the criminal case in which the complainant's son and nephew were accused Advocate was not in any legal or moral right to withdraw or withdraw their offer, Special to the Dispensary Committee Was given in front of It was meant to end the dispute and could not be investigated at all list of supreme court advocates from Chaghi lawyer