HAJI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus RANA MUHAMMAD SARWAR
Section 148, O VIII, R 10 & O XXXVII, Rr 2, 3 The suit against the defendant for the receipt of money on the basis of the prototype application to defend the claim that if the defendant appeared and filed a defense claim It does not matter if the application is accepted; the trial court, despite numerous delays, did not approve the defendant's conditional request to provide the equivalent amount of security until the next date of hearing, nor did he offer a bond of guarantee. Nor have any written statements been filed, and the trial court dismissed the order to accept leave for leave against the plaintiff in the lawsuit filed against the plaintiff. The trial court rightly acted on the order filed by Plaintiff Order VIII, R 10, the CPC granted the court the power to issue a judgment against the defendant or make such order ? The party will fail to file a written statement within the time set by Rule 10 of the court. FO VIII, CPC is punishable in nature; it was in the jurisdiction of the court that it could make a decision without recording the evidence, Cannot interfere with trial and order passed by the trial court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Tando Adam lawyer