ASIAN FOOD INDUS-TRIES versus MESSRS ISMAIL INDUSTRIES
O II, R 2 & O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 Claim separation of claim Claim was dismissed in the first case and interim relief was denied The plaintiff then requested interim relief in a later case. Which was the reason for the process. Relief cannot be made a matter of a subsequent matter which is why it was not permissible to separate the claims arising out of the action as the parties were subjected to the provisions of 0 11, R 2, CPC. Cannot be credited twice for processing. Was deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
