Paragraphs 4 and 27 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 45 (1973) of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) sale of land in violation of West Pakistan Land Reform Regulation, 1959 MLR 64) Rejecting the Change = Civil Court, Federal Land Commission Plaintiff's jurisdiction asserted the sale on the basis that it was in violation of MLR 64, and all courts below declared the sale invalid. The reasoning was that regardless of the fact that the sale was a sale or not. The matters were valid and bound to the parties and the process was for the authorities constituted under the Federal Land Commission or MLR 64, to be granted immunity or otherwise claimed by the defendants of the sale. Whether the civil court had jurisdiction clearly. In this way, the following courts, including the High Court, faced the misunderstanding of the law, taking into account the issue and deciding the nature of the sale transaction. Their jurisdiction was exercised contrary to the provisions of the law below. The leave of appeal was passed by the Supreme Court to examine the above-mentioned question of law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
