MST MAH RUKH BATOOL versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.III
It was decided to sell the mortgaged property object for recovery filed by AIX, R 13 and Section 47 respondent bank and during the execution proceedings, the appellant had on the basis of a mortgage auction An objection was filed by the appellant that the appellant had called and said the property. The application for sale in favor of the appellant was dismissed for non-prosecution and the other application was subsequently dismissed for restraint by law. The appellant's moderation in the confession that the case was decided only on the day of the hearing to submit a written response. Submitted, was not acceptable and may be the only real object request maintenance field but not to make any other application even otherwise, the seller's contract did not defeat the rights of the decedent and No one has a legal right to a person. Under the specific performance of the contract, the Decreeholder was not enforced by the Appellant which was established by the Appellant's Second Request was not enforceable under the principle in O IX, on R 9 of the CPC Appeal Was deleted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
