Find a Lawyer

KHATTAK ALLIED CONSTRUCTION CO. versus C.P.E.C.C.

Civil Procedure Code Order VIII and O. VIII, Rr, 1 and 6 of the CPC Writing Statement in the dismissal of Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 120, in rejecting the documentary evidence presented by the plaintiff Proof of Failure As a contractor with the defendant, acted in accordance with the contract but the defendant failed to pay, the work done by the plaintiff was supported by a 191-page document ? The plaintiff was regularly examined by the plaintiff's counselor or engineer, after considering the evidence on record by the plaintiff's trial court, after the partial dismissal of the judgment in the plaintiff, any document by the defendant Was not kept on record. The plaintiff's favor in favor of the plaintiff was that it requested a concession on her behalf and was not even considered by the trial court. The oral testimony of the isolation witness presented by the defendants was not sufficient to refute the credible and credible evidence that was authenticated by the counsel, neither in the written statement nor the defendant's leadership. I've been asked to dispute the accuracy of a single word or to challenge it. In the absence of any recovery on record in the form of documentary evidence presented by the defendant, the documentary evidence presented by the plaintiff was kept on record without any objection by the defendant. Was to rely on them. And the trial court rightly took that into consideration. It was proved that whatever work was done by the plaintiff alone immigration advocate from Sehwan lawyer