KHAWAR versus THE STATE
Section 9 (c) Definition of Evidence Although the three prosecution witnesses were from the same organization, they were good witnesses like any other, especially when there was no hostility between the prosecution's witnesses and the accused in the evidence of the incident. Controversies that arose The defense witnesses were not of the utmost importance as such contradictions were found in the oral version of the prosecution's witnesses, about 18 months after the incident in which the prosecution's witnesses were questioned. There is a heroin powder available in the court to which he replied that it was light brown. Such a question was a confession of the presence of heroin powder in the car at the time of the witnesses' testimony, which was reported on a chemical examination outside the goods. What was signed by this officer was the ability to examine the whole thing and sign the notice of being in charge of a laboratory defense in addition to the heroin number of the daily entry about the departure of the police party from the relevant police station or Something else has been specifically claimed or claimed, though not by witnesses. He was not the entry was submitted, but this will have no effect from leaving. And in the present case, the auxiliary evidence for the seizure of goods and the arrest of the accused was confiscated and if there was a case of failure to do so, it could have been in small quantities, including one in custody. Was caught The suspect, after being fully set up, links the vehicle with the equipment for the purpose of retrieving six kilograms of heroin powder from the occupants of the suspects.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Larkana lawyer