Find a Lawyer

MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI versus GHULAM ABBAS

He was also a member of the Section 3 Tribunal hearing as Chairman of the Bench. Whereas sections AA (a) (a) and (b) of the Act, provided that the decision is heard by a majority of the members and in the case of discrimination between the members of the bench or the equal distribution of members, the matter should be referred to the chairman. Ga and whichever opinion expressed by him would be superseded, and in the present case, the decision of the Tribunal was written by the Chairman, and all the members agreed with it. , Assuming that a member has joined the proceedings without any legal authority but the judgment may still remain, as the Bench consisted of more than two members of the Tribunal and the said member (retired) Had expressed concern over the impact of the decision. After the verdict was passed, a former High Court judge could be treated by the authors as the chairman of the service tribunal who served as a straight member, Emede, before retiring. It will be deemed that, in good faith, the exercise of the same power would involve itself in this matter, in which the participation of the said member as a member of the Bench did not cause any prejudice. In the parties, because he did not write the decision, nor is it likely to influence his decision in any way because the chairman wrote similarly and the other two members agreed. ? ask a advocate free from Rawala Kot lawyer