Find a Lawyer

MST. SAKINA versus S.S.P.

Criminalization of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10/16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application After the abolition of the PDF, any restriction on the preceding withdrawal of the case by a female accused of breaking the marriage or There was no interruption. Marriage The accused woman had two marriages at the time, and during the period of her previous marriage, she could not contract the second valid marriage, in the changed scenario the accused could not justify her second marriage simply because when she made the contract. Had gone there, there was no mutual companionship. The suspect, along with her other husband, apparently believed that she would be considered adulterated for rational conduct and for having sex with her, and the same charge was sought in the FIR, which was tried to end. Thus, there was no case of recovery of the FLR. If the accused did not want to be with her ex-husband, the only way for her to do so was to take a stand on the principle of the open o f freeways. M. The competent court and unless this order is found in her favor, the constitutional request to remain separate from her other husband was dismissed accordingly. solicitors from Topi lawyer