MESSRS BASF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD versus MESSRS TANOCRAFT LIMITED
A VII, R 2 and O VIII, R 10 suit for recovery of money The lawyer appearing before the trial defendant and the court carries a heavy burden of observing that there is no injustice to the non-serving party. The provisions of O VIII, 10, CPC were not meant to give the court no choice but to make a decision in favor of the plaintiff, unless the written statement was filed, VIII, R 10 , The CPC did not create a rule for the decision to be made and the order may be automatically passed or the decision may be made mechanically under oh VIII, R 10, indicating the CPC Or that the court should apply its mind to the merits of the case before the trial court trial to prove its case and it was the duty of the court. See if this case was filed within time
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Darya Khan lawyer
