MST. NASIM AKHTAR versus THE STATE
Section 2302 and QQ Qun Qanun's testimony (10 of 1984, of 10), the confessional statement of the accused accused of testimony was neither legally recorded nor was it appropriate in the present circumstances of the case which the accused's serologist. The blood-stained land was recovered on this matter. And its human origin could not be determined; it did not link the accused to the crime; a piece of fraudulent evidence cannot be used to substantiate any other defective piece of evidence. The father of the deceased's father and daughter. Statements that were not confirmed by any other strong evidence. The accused was not participated in the incident because of the incident, the prosecution's case was based on uncertainties and the accused was involved on suspicion while the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Shankiari lawyer