Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/16 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 467/468/471 Bail Patrol Under the inquiry FIR, it is alleged that after a delay of thirteen months, the person allegedly filed an FIR by Germany, the same police have alleged that the complainant has given him his wish. Was kidnapped against. Syed Lady had also made a statement in support of this allegation before the Magistrate under Section 160, CR. According to the FIR, the person allegedly filed a lawsuit against the complainant in order to trace the marriage, which was pending before the Family Court Lady on the grounds that he had entered into a valid marriage with the co-accused. And had a marriage with the complainant. Shame and the Bogus Lady had stated that she had been living with a co-accused who had been her husband since his marriage with her and said that a girl was now married at about 8/9 months old. Initially, the alleged role of the accused against the accused in the FIR was a matter of temperament and during the investigation of the case, the accused did not recover the accused, the accused was in judicial custody. And their detention was no longer needed for the purpose of interrogation. The accused demanded further inquiry into the scope of Section 497 (2), CR PC, they were admitted on bail under the circumstances. famous high court advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer