Find a Lawyer

NIB BANK LTD. versus SUNSHINE CLOTH LTD. THROUGH OFFICIAL LIQUIDATORS

Section 18 Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), Section 316 Bank Debt Recovery Order Implementing Order, filed a petition against the decision-makers but was dismissed by the banking court between the parties. The dispute was not an important decision. The lender was not a company. After executing the decree, the regulator approached the company court. The company court rejected the execution request for execution of the order and partially issued the order against the company accepting the decision. And accepted the finalization and the decision to execute the decree before the establishment of the company court is due to the fact that the decree holder filed the execution of the decree within three years of the approval of the decree and the execution of the decree Failed to import, within three years of this order the High Court has set aside the matter Banking and the custody on remand appeal with the court process. Permission was granted accordingly

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Prof. (Retd.) Raja MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN v. HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION through District Manager 2013 CLD 2030
• MUHAMMAD v. Mst. KHATOON 2013 YLR 2036
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, MULTAN v. MOVE (PVT.) LTD., MULTAN 2013 PTD 2040
• Rana MUBASHAR ALI v. State 2013 YLR 2049
• ISHTIAQ alias SHAITI v. State 2013 YLR 2054
• ALPHA CHEMICALS (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PTD 2064
• SHAHZAD SALEEM v. TARIQ MAHMOOD 2013 YLR 2071
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. MULTAN FABRICS (PVT.) LTD. 2013 PTD 2077

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

famous supreme court advocate from Bhera lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes