Find a Lawyer

ABDUR REHMAN versus MUHAMMAD KHAN ALIAS KHAN MUHAMMAD

In the suit, both the plaintiff and the defendant were co-partners in the suit, for the termination of sections 6 and 13 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 - and in another case, the plaintiff was not a partner. ? In order to vacate half of the case in which he was a co-partner and in another case in which he was not a cashier, he had no right to bail before the appellate court. In the circumstances, the claim was not justified in rejecting. That both the plaintiff and the plaintiff were joint partners in the loss and that they had equal rights to equality. Will pass and to that extent the order of this case is dismissed and dismissed. Plaintiff's case for half share in the second case in which the plaintiff was not a partner famous high court advocate from Tarnol lawyer