The value of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13E evidence was not shown nor disclosed at the stage of recording its statement under section 2342, before the CCP entry was recovered by the investigating officer in the police station diary. Had not been presented before leaving and only appeared after the defendant's statement. The trial court took it on record without examining the person concerned for the sake of the allegation, in which case his admission was at that time, he was denied the right to cross-examine, allegedly. Non-sealing of arms recovered from the accused and non-reference to ballistic exports indicate the departure of non-production P of the station diary at the relevant time due to tents in the case of litigation. And Zeiss at the time could not be ignored because the prosecutor was obliged to present such important evidence at the appropriate time. The conviction imposed on the accused by the Dalit was set aside and in this case the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
