Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus CH. SHER MUHAMMAD

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 12, 42 and 54 for the specific performance of the oral contract, declaration and permanent injunction suit shop were jointly owned by the parties and occupied half of each. After the delivery was reached, the informants arranged through the reconciliation process. The plaintiffs and plaintiffs were one of the plaintiffs who paid the plaintiff's payment for the plaintiff's oral payment and the plaintiff's payment, and as a plaintiff, his witnesses acknowledged that the money made between the parties. Was never approved. Defendant / seller refuses to process and file lawsuit on plaintiff who never received a favorable amount, in which the final agreement between the parties to the sale for the sale of the suit shop never existed and In the event of non-exchange, the broader terms of the transaction between the plaintiff and the defendant, such as the agreement entered into by the merchants to sell the contract, were not confirmed. Court, in the circumstances, in the absence of any legal error in the decision and order of the trial I dismissed the case rightly, decision and order cannot be interrupted in appeal best law firm from Kurram Agency lawyer