Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 417/KB TO 420/KB OF 2000-2001, DECIDED ON 27TH JULY, 2002. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 417/KB TO 420/KB OF 2000-2001, DECIDED ON 27TH JULY, 2002.

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 108 (b), 142, 50 and 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance (XLJX of 2001), Section 182 total income and the failure to offer certain statement refunds, 2,001 fines before being imposed early. To impose Moving forward to impose fines every day, separately, separately. Legality Law requires that the default commissioner in filing statements be fined up to two thousand rupees, and the equivalent of two hundred rupees every day during which the default is continued, in the law, fines do not want to be the source of Germany. Under section 50 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, a person was obliged to collect the tax from the person to whom he was paying, whereas the collection of tax was primarily the duty of the Income Tax Ordinance, not just the section of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. 142 imposed a duty on a person who paid to file such statements. Which gives details of recipients that the recipient may not be able to provide to the department given the tax customs and lack of documentation. It is not surprising that many people should refuse to do business with someone who seeks to enforce the law fully in the first place, in addition to the action under it. Failure to file statements also threatened to punish him. Section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 as well as Section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, in lieu of performing these services and threatening to be pre-emptive for any small or small tax deduction. Under, jobs for fresh advocates from Morgah lawyer