CHIEF EXECUTIVE BABRI COTTON MILLS versus MUSHTAQ AHMED
Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O12 job services were terminated due to financial crises and termination of employees post when employees against the order of employees. Upon filing a complaint request from the Labor Court, terminating his service, he ordered the termination of employment on the basis that he was not removed from the presence of his juniors as a senior in his cadre. Maybe, even according to the seniority list, the employee was the most senior in his cadre / section. They could not prove that the employees were offered to exchange in another part as a condition of their employment, but the employee was not satisfied that such offer was not written in writing. Nor was the employer taken in a written statement. This cannot be relied upon especially when the juniors from the job were retained in the service, the Labor Court correctly stated in the circumstances that the employees were senior in their cadre. The appeal against the Labor Court verdict could not be dismissed in the presence of, was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
