Find a Lawyer

JAVED HASHMI versus THE STATE

Articles 9 (v) and 16 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999, allegations of bail, corruption and corruption allegations have been in custody for more than a year and one of sixty witnesses Was cited. Despite the clear provision of Article 16 of the NAB NAB Ordinance, only nineteen witnesses were examined, provided that the matter would be heard on a daily basis and resolved within 30 days. Of the thirteen allegations against the accused, the Banimards / Deputy Prosecutor General was unsure how many prosecution witnesses would be produced and how many would be investigated, recording only the entire prosecution's evidence. Only after the accused will present his defense can even be produced without the defendant or the Supreme Court verdict. Formed a party in the event that the prosecution had to dispose of a large part of its evidence or the applicant had yet to enter his defense, the proportion of the trial would be in balance, the defendant detained during the national The election was contested for the seat of the assembly, its papers were checked for nomination, the objections were nullified and the member was elected as a member of the National Assembly, the accused as a legislative assembly. Had to attend and represent his constituency if he had not given the accused the opportunity to attend the parliament meeting I will deny it. The right to represent the public and its constituents will be unrepresented, which will be a violation of their constitutional rights. best advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer