SIKANDAR ALI ALIAS SIKOO SHAIKH versus THE STATE
Section 5A5A / West West West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XNX65656565), Section 13D Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 35, 397 and 561 were tried together with a convicted citizen. Was kidnapped for three separate offenses of kidnapping. The waiver of having an unlicensed weapon and all these offenses were carried out in different places and at different times and were separately prosecuted for being unattached and independent of each other, CRPC on such matters. Applicable to which no unusual demand could be made Ordering all sentences to run simultaneously would not record such an order would mean that the trial court accused the accused in view of the nature of the cases against the High Court. He did not intend to order death as well as execute, but his death sentence also Is reduced. In the same case, the sentence of life imprisonment was not considered to be capable of directing the convictions to run concurrently, even after the dismissal of the appeal, in the third case by the High Court. The decisions were finalized under Section 61 A Cr A, and the latest sentence was issued for the simultaneous execution of powers under CR. The High Court of Appeal ruled that the accused's instruction to run concurrently was not acceptable.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Chacklala lawyer