Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

WEST PAKISTAN PROVINCE versus HAZRAT GUL KHAN AND ANOTHER


The jurisdiction of section 9 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1962 challenged the court to decide the question before proceeding one step in the matter.

P L D 1966 (W. P.) Peshawar 34

Before Faizullah Khan, J

WEST PAKISTAN PROVINCE‑Petitioner

versus

HAZRAT GUL KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Revision No. 115 of 1964, decided on 5th July 1965.

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

, S. 9 Jurisdiction of Court challenged‑Court to decide question before proceeding one step-further in case.

Sher Bahadur Khan, A. A.‑G. for Petitioner.

Abdul Samad Khan for Respondent No. 1.

Date of hearing: 5th July 1965.

JUDGMENT

This revision is directed against the order, dated 8‑7‑1964, of the Senior Civil Judge, Hazara, whereunder, purporting to act under section 8 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (Act No. X of 1940), he appointed the Superintending Engineer, Irrigation, Northern Circle, Mardan, as an "arbitrator to decide upon the respective points and dispute between the parties".

2. It will be sufficient for the disposal of this revision to say that the order of the learned Senior Civil Judge cannot be sustained for the short and good reason that as many as nine issues were settled in the case, including issue No. 7, namely, whether the Senior Civil Judge had got jurisdiction to entertain the application. The learned Senior Civil Judge, however, passed the impugned order without giving any finding, on any one of the issues. This, in my view, was not the proper way of disposing the case.

3. In view of issue No. 7, disputing the jurisdiction of the Senior Civil Judge to entertain the suit, it was incumbent on him to have recorded a clear cut finding on that issue, and without having decided that he had jurisdiction to entertain the suit, he could not have recorded any finding, whatsoever, on other issues, in that to do so, was exercising jurisdiction without having held, whether he had jurisdiction to entertain the suit. In all cases where the question of jurisdiction is raised, the Court must con sider and decide the question before it can move one step further in the case, as any movement is necessarily in exercise of jurisdiction.

4. I, therefore, accept this revision petition, set aside the impugned order and remit the case for decision on all the issues. Parties should appear in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Hazara, on 31‑7‑1965.

K. B. A. Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Muridkay lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.