RIAZ HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR
Section 47 and OXXI, Rr 10, 22, 23 filed without request for objection to the execution request words O's wishes, such as O XXI, R 10, CPC jurisdiction and applicable declaration order holder. Without being processed, the judge's creditors filed the objection under section 47, the CPC against the execution of the order, the Appellate Court and the appellate court dismissed the petitioners' plea but the high court amended Jurisdiction allowed this request. Filed under O XXI, R 22 and notice was issued, the CPC decision was issued on the basis of the decision by the Civil Procedure, for the failure to file the execution order by the accuracy order taker. The right to file an objection was waived and the Dry Code, 1908, was a jurisdiction which could not be denied by blowing up the wishes used in O XXI, R 10, by the CPC predicting or hyper-technical. Avoiding the grounds that non-application of the execution request is prohibited from maintaining the application of the objections; The section was not necessary to apply the object under 47, the Supreme Court refused to intervene PC. Appeal dismissed with order passed by High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Narang Mandi lawyer