Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 6625/LB, 6625-A/LB AND 6625-B/LB OF 1996, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 2002. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 6625/LB, 6625-A/LB AND 6625-B/LB OF 1996, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 2002.

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 62, 63 and 59 (1) Evaluation of preparation of evidence of accounts etc. Section 59 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 did not conform to the usual assessment provisions for the sending of IT. Be made under section 62 or 63 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 or in any other section of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the order was being passed in writing instead of section 59 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, all these provisions. In writing, approval of the passage of the order was a legal obligation which was to be complied with and in the absence of it could be demanded along with the IT 30 form under section 85 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Is. Do not replace a writing of order No by any means the application of the IT30 form mind is meant to be, rather it was a mechanical sheet in which the Appellate Tribunal was filled in to fill the vacancies App that merely created vacancies. Filling / Including: Some data in the IT30 form was not sufficient to meet the legal requirements of an order in writing under section 62 or 63 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and absence of a formal order of review. I was summoned for tax money and found out that it was an illegal IT30 form and that the demand notice was in writing As may be presumed under section 62 or 63 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and as such no order can be requested to exist. Relative assessment year family advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer